[1]宋曉毓,劉新利,吳壯志,等.材料界面結(jié)合強(qiáng)度評價方法研究進(jìn)展[J].中國材料進(jìn)展,2020,(09):681-690.[doi:10.7502/j.issn.1674-3962.201905002]
SONG Xiaoyu,LIU Xinli,WU Zhuangzhi,et al.Review on Evaluation Methods of Material Interface Bonding Strength[J].MATERIALS CHINA,2020,(09):681-690.[doi:10.7502/j.issn.1674-3962.201905002]
點(diǎn)擊復(fù)制
材料界面結(jié)合強(qiáng)度評價方法研究進(jìn)展(
)
中國材料進(jìn)展[ISSN:1674-3962/CN:61-1473/TG]
- 卷:
-
- 期數(shù):
-
2020年第09期
- 頁碼:
-
681-690
- 欄目:
-
- 出版日期:
-
2020-09-30
文章信息/Info
- Title:
-
Review on Evaluation Methods of Material Interface Bonding Strength
- 文章編號:
-
1674-3962(2020)09-0681-10
- 作者:
-
宋曉毓; 劉新利; 吳壯志; 段柏華; 王德志
-
(中南大學(xué)材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)院,湖南 長沙 410083)
- Author(s):
-
SONG Xiaoyu; LIU Xinli; WU Zhuangzhi; DUAN Bohua; WANG Dezhi
-
(School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
-
- 關(guān)鍵詞:
-
界面; 結(jié)合強(qiáng)度; 評價方法; 靜態(tài)法; 動態(tài)法
- Keywords:
-
interface; bonding strength; valuation method; static method; dynamic method
- 分類號:
-
TB33;TB302
- DOI:
-
10.7502/j.issn.1674-3962.201905002
- 文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)志碼:
-
A
- 摘要:
-
基于靜態(tài)法和動態(tài)法分類總結(jié)了材料界面結(jié)合強(qiáng)度的常用評價方法,靜態(tài)法主要包括剝離法、剪切法、拉伸法、彎曲法、納米劃痕法、激光劃痕法、激光層裂法和無損評價法等;動態(tài)法主要包括單擺沖擊劃痕法、多沖接觸疲勞法和滾動接觸疲勞法等。此外,材料界面結(jié)合強(qiáng)度評價還可借助有限元輔助分析,該方法可模擬分析靜態(tài)法、動態(tài)法等方法的測量過程。各種方法的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)及適用條件不同,因此應(yīng)根據(jù)界面處兩種材料的熱學(xué)和力學(xué)性能等差異,選取合適的測量方法,再結(jié)合力學(xué)分析模型,選擇合適的求解方法,得到材料的界面結(jié)合強(qiáng)度。隨著新材料和新型表征技術(shù)的涌現(xiàn),研究者們需要不斷改進(jìn)現(xiàn)有的測試方法,使材料界面結(jié)合強(qiáng)度評價方法更加簡單易行、定量準(zhǔn)確。
- Abstract:
-
Based on the classification of the static method and the dynamic method, the common evaluation methods of material interface bonding strength are summarized. The static methods mainly include peel method, shear method, stretch method, bend method, nano scratch method, laser scratch method, laser spallation method and non-destructive evaluation method. The dynamic methods mainly include single pendulum impact scratch method, repeated impact contact method and rolling contact fatigue method. In addition, there is a finite element analysis method, which can simulate the process of the static method and the dynamic method. Each evaluation method has its advantage, disadvantage and applicable condition. According to the difference of thermal and mechanical properties of the two materials in interface, the appropriate measurement method should be selected, and then the appropriate measurement method should be combined with the mechanical analysis model to select the appropriate solution method to obtain the interface bonding strength of the material. In addition, with the emergence of new materials and new characterization techniques, it is necessary to continuously improve the existing testing methods, so that the evaluation methods for the material interface bonding strength are simple and accurate.
備注/Memo
- 備注/Memo:
-
收稿日期:2019-05-07修回日期:2019-08-01 基金項(xiàng)目:國家重點(diǎn)研發(fā)計劃資助項(xiàng)目(2018YFC1901700)第一作者:宋曉毓,女,1995年生,碩士研究生通訊作者:劉新利,女,1985年生,副教授,碩士生導(dǎo)師, Email:liuxinli@csu.edu.cn 王德志,男,1968年生,教授,博士生導(dǎo)師, Email:dzwang@csu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update:
2020-08-28